<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quicksilver alternatives for Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 06:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never been convinced by Linux? Here is a challenge for you. - Page 111 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-172799</link>
		<dc:creator>Never been convinced by Linux? Here is a challenge for you. - Page 111 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-172799</guid>
		<description>[...] for Linux that&#039;s as good as iMovie (not that it&#039;s the best, of course).    There are various Linux Quicksilver clones out there to my understanding. It seems &quot;Gnome Do&quot; might be the most popular one (and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Linux that&#8217;s as good as iMovie (not that it&#8217;s the best, of course).    There are various Linux Quicksilver clones out there to my understanding. It seems &quot;Gnome Do&quot; might be the most popular one (and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: April 23rd, 2009 - Part 2 &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-171389</link>
		<dc:creator>IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: April 23rd, 2009 - Part 2 &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-171389</guid>
		<description>[...] http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/&#038;#8230" rel="nofollow">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/&#038;#8230</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edoardo</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-100598</link>
		<dc:creator>Edoardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-100598</guid>
		<description>Launchy for linux has been released... I like it more than gnome-do 

http://www.launchy.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Launchy for linux has been released&#8230; I like it more than gnome-do </p>
<p><a href="http://www.launchy.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.launchy.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diwaker Gupta</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-29230</link>
		<dc:creator>Diwaker Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-29230</guid>
		<description>*@tejasvi*: while packages might be unavailable for other distributions at this point, you should be able to download and install from source fairly easily. And the way the project is going, I&#039;m more than confident that it will be packaged for most popular distributions before the end of the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*@tejasvi*: while packages might be unavailable for other distributions at this point, you should be able to download and install from source fairly easily. And the way the project is going, I&#8217;m more than confident that it will be packaged for most popular distributions before the end of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T e j a s v i</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-29220</link>
		<dc:creator>T e j a s v i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-29220</guid>
		<description>I got introduced to QuickSilver early last year and this influenced my purchase of the Macbook a great deal. Its quite possibly the most worthwhile app I have used in a while :). I cant seem to do without my mac when at work, mostly because of QS. Nice to hear about Gnome Do, but looks like a shift to Ubuntu is the only way to get this baby working in an easy way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got introduced to QuickSilver early last year and this influenced my purchase of the Macbook a great deal. Its quite possibly the most worthwhile app I have used in a while :). I cant seem to do without my mac when at work, mostly because of QS. Nice to hear about Gnome Do, but looks like a shift to Ubuntu is the only way to get this baby working in an easy way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diwaker Gupta</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-25197</link>
		<dc:creator>Diwaker Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-25197</guid>
		<description>*@tel*: You make some good points. However, for me at least, a big part of Quicksilver&#039;s appeal is the UI. I am fairly competent with both zsh and bash and I would not even begin comparing them with Quicksilver. So calling QS &quot;just a rediscovery&quot; seems a little too harsh :-)

Meanwhile, QS is much more than just an application launcher. The whole point is to have a universal UI for actions -- once you get a hang of the plugin system, you can unify more and more of your workflows into that single interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*@tel*: You make some good points. However, for me at least, a big part of Quicksilver&#8217;s appeal is the UI. I am fairly competent with both zsh and bash and I would not even begin comparing them with Quicksilver. So calling QS &#8220;just a rediscovery&#8221; seems a little too harsh :-)</p>
<p>Meanwhile, QS is much more than just an application launcher. The whole point is to have a universal UI for actions &#8212; once you get a hang of the plugin system, you can unify more and more of your workflows into that single interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tel</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-25184</link>
		<dc:creator>Tel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-25184</guid>
		<description>Quicksilver is just a rediscovery of the command line interface. You know how all the mums and dads would NEVER be able to work a command line because a GUI is so much easier? Well, Linux has always had powerful command line shells with tab-completion. You can check out zsh or bash.

You can even look at the &quot;waffle&quot; package that is part of the sawfish window manager which has been EXACTLY doing what Quicksilver does since 2003 (i.e. pop-up command completion over GUI background).

Most users find that there are no more than a dozen applications that they regularly launch and assigning a few hotkeys ends up being more efficient (and easier) than a quicksliver-style interface which is why the sawfish/waffle thingy never got popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quicksilver is just a rediscovery of the command line interface. You know how all the mums and dads would NEVER be able to work a command line because a GUI is so much easier? Well, Linux has always had powerful command line shells with tab-completion. You can check out zsh or bash.</p>
<p>You can even look at the &#8220;waffle&#8221; package that is part of the sawfish window manager which has been EXACTLY doing what Quicksilver does since 2003 (i.e. pop-up command completion over GUI background).</p>
<p>Most users find that there are no more than a dozen applications that they regularly launch and assigning a few hotkeys ends up being more efficient (and easier) than a quicksliver-style interface which is why the sawfish/waffle thingy never got popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cillian</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-23253</link>
		<dc:creator>Cillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-23253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used it for less than a day, but I&#039;m totally hooked. Gnome-launch-box used to stall on me from time to time and I only ever used it to launch apps, GNOME Do is lightening fast and already has more functionality. I asked about changing the default colour to black in the code on launchpad and David responded within an hour with instructions! I&#039;m using it on GNOME so I don&#039;t know about issues with KDE but if you&#039;ve reported them already I bet they&#039;ll be dealt with quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used it for less than a day, but I&#8217;m totally hooked. Gnome-launch-box used to stall on me from time to time and I only ever used it to launch apps, GNOME Do is lightening fast and already has more functionality. I asked about changing the default colour to black in the code on launchpad and David responded within an hour with instructions! I&#8217;m using it on GNOME so I don&#8217;t know about issues with KDE but if you&#8217;ve reported them already I bet they&#8217;ll be dealt with quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diwaker Gupta</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-23189</link>
		<dc:creator>Diwaker Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-23189</guid>
		<description>*@cillian*: Even I&#039;m giving it a shot these days, though it doesn&#039;t behave very nicely with KDE yet :-( Let me know what your experience is like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*@cillian*: Even I&#8217;m giving it a shot these days, though it doesn&#8217;t behave very nicely with KDE yet :-( Let me know what your experience is like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cillian</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux/#comment-23056</link>
		<dc:creator>Cillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/2007/12/06/quicksilver-alternatives-for-linux#comment-23056</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a happy user of gnome-launch-box since it first came out and have been disappointed that it hasn&#039;t moved much. I recently heard about quicksilver going open source and have been holding my breath for a Linux version, there&#039;s no sign of one yet, but this is the first I&#039;ve heard of GNOME Do and it sounds like an active and exciting project. Thanks for the tip, I&#039;ll be installing it and trying it out very soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a happy user of gnome-launch-box since it first came out and have been disappointed that it hasn&#8217;t moved much. I recently heard about quicksilver going open source and have been holding my breath for a Linux version, there&#8217;s no sign of one yet, but this is the first I&#8217;ve heard of GNOME Do and it sounds like an active and exciting project. Thanks for the tip, I&#8217;ll be installing it and trying it out very soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

