Comments on: Reconsidering Vim

By: Diwaker Gupta

Diwaker Gupta — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:46:31 +0000

@Mike: All good points Mike. But the world has room for yet another editor :)

By: Diwaker Gupta

Diwaker Gupta — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:45:57 +0000

@siddharth dave: :)

By: Emacs vs. Vim

Emacs vs. Vim — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:02:06 +0000

[...] Floating Sun Skip to content WelcomeBlogWritingUCSD Graduate Student FAQHOWTO: Install awstats on TextdriveHOWTO: Ubuntu on IBM Thinkpad T42Apping for DummiesOn email obfuscationProjectsComics GrabberWP-DokuwikiTest PageWordpress WidgetsResearchPublicationsCoursesArchivesAboutColophonTriviaTextdrive Who’s WhoWish listLegaleseContact « Reconsidering Vim [...]

By: siddharth dave

siddharth dave — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:51:59 +0000

i am sure writing emacs kernel modules & improving its boot time will be fun ;-)

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:16:11 +0000

A few comments about your post. I like EMACS and what it does, that I can easily add to it, I like LISP, and it works very well. What I don’t like is all the multi-finger chording. In VI(M)s favor is that VI exists on every unix system, is small, fast, light, and works over buggy connections. I have used VI for 20 years and take it to any system I work on if it’s not already there. Emacs is great for integration to the OS and the world. VI is great for editing.

By: Nikhil

Nikhil — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:24:46 +0000

Will be waiting for your analysis…