<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Floating Sun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://floatingsun.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://floatingsun.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amarok ate your stats? by Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2009/01/18/amarok-ate-your-stats/#comment-251142</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/?p=1003#comment-251142</guid>
		<description>You seem to be like me and spend a considerable time rating your songs. You should really consider setting up a daily backup of your amarok database.

I&#039;ve configured it to use a real MySql server, instead of an embedded one, and I&#039;ve set the backups to run daily and logrotate to rotate them up to one week. This is the minimal that I would consider for avoiding loosing all the hard work you&#039;ve put on song rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be like me and spend a considerable time rating your songs. You should really consider setting up a daily backup of your amarok database.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve configured it to use a real MySql server, instead of an embedded one, and I&#8217;ve set the backups to run daily and logrotate to rotate them up to one week. This is the minimal that I would consider for avoiding loosing all the hard work you&#8217;ve put on song rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac Tip: Get wifi password from another (connected) Mac by kamal</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2011/09/10/mac-tip-get-wifi-password-from-another-connected-mac/#comment-250084</link>
		<dc:creator>kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/?p=1835#comment-250084</guid>
		<description>i do not understand how to know about another wifi password.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do not understand how to know about another wifi password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on India Census 2011 by web developement india</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2010/04/04/india-census-2011/#comment-248042</link>
		<dc:creator>web developement india</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/?p=1255#comment-248042</guid>
		<description>Heya i&#039;m for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful &amp; it helped me out much. I am hoping to present one thing again and aid others like you helped me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya i&#8217;m for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful &amp; it helped me out much. I am hoping to present one thing again and aid others like you helped me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reconsidering Vim by ivan.harden</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2009/11/08/reconsidering-vim/#comment-243201</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan.harden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/?p=1160#comment-243201</guid>
		<description>(I&#039;m a long time Vim user who has lately started to play with emacs)

I understand your point of view, and would just like to comment on one point.
You say, &quot;part of this has to do with the BDFL model in Vim. Bram Moolenar has done a tremendous job in bringing Vim to the stage where it is. People can and have forked Vim in the past. But for one reason or another, Vim has stayed Vim, and its development trajectory has been slow and incremental.&quot;

I see no difference between Vim and Emacs/RMS in this respect. Many &quot;fights&quot; have been seen on emacs dev. maillist, and often RMS disregards the opinions of others with &quot;I see it this way. So it shall be.&quot; (literal quote from some I encountered once).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I&#8217;m a long time Vim user who has lately started to play with emacs)</p>
<p>I understand your point of view, and would just like to comment on one point.<br />
You say, &#8220;part of this has to do with the BDFL model in Vim. Bram Moolenar has done a tremendous job in bringing Vim to the stage where it is. People can and have forked Vim in the past. But for one reason or another, Vim has stayed Vim, and its development trajectory has been slow and incremental.&#8221;</p>
<p>I see no difference between Vim and Emacs/RMS in this respect. Many &#8220;fights&#8221; have been seen on emacs dev. maillist, and often RMS disregards the opinions of others with &#8220;I see it this way. So it shall be.&#8221; (literal quote from some I encountered once).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whats with __MACOSX in Zip files? by Graflgauze</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/02/07/whats-with-__macosx-in-zip-files/#comment-242563</link>
		<dc:creator>Graflgauze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/blog/2007/02/07/793/#comment-242563</guid>
		<description>Sorry yes, that would be the .DS_Store file that is written all over the damn place in OSX-created things</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry yes, that would be the .DS_Store file that is written all over the damn place in OSX-created things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whats with __MACOSX in Zip files? by Mraof</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/02/07/whats-with-__macosx-in-zip-files/#comment-241756</link>
		<dc:creator>Mraof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/blog/2007/02/07/793/#comment-241756</guid>
		<description>Well, that explains that weird folder that I was wondering about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that explains that weird folder that I was wondering about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whats with __MACOSX in Zip files? by Zana</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/02/07/whats-with-__macosx-in-zip-files/#comment-241023</link>
		<dc:creator>Zana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/blog/2007/02/07/793/#comment-241023</guid>
		<description>As someone who recently had to use some Macs for work (after years of coding/scripting/Windows domain management) I have to agree with the author that often the Mac OS behavior is idiotic and NOT &quot;more user friendly.&quot;

To me, needing to issue a TERMINAL COMMAND is HELLISHLY more complex than it needs to be.  It is not &quot;simple&quot; by any stretch of the imagination.  You COULD use Powershell/CMD to do crap like this but the point is that in Windows basic stuff like this is EASY to do and follows LOGICAL, PREDICTABLE steps.

Obviously, as someone who has debugged hundreds of thousands of lines of assembly in IDA Pro, it&#039;s not &quot;hard&quot; for me to use the terminal to show hidden files or create an archive, but I really don&#039;t care about whether it&#039;s &quot;hard&quot; for me.  The point is that it is outrageously harder IN COMPARISON to Windows to achieve the same thing (create a simple Zip file without added thumbnails/metadata).  Using a command line to accomplish things is virtually NEVER easier unless you (a) have a photographic memory (b) there is no other way.  Unix/Linux/Ubuntu did not become more popular/usable by ELIMINATING graphical options.

Saying &quot;oh here&#039;s the solution, just download a third party application to correct the problem&quot; is basically agreeing that Mac has failed to do anything better than the competition, since that is basically how Windows/nix work.  The whole point of Mac is ALLEGEDLY that is does things better/more simply out of the box, but in fact it requires terminal commands to make basic changes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who recently had to use some Macs for work (after years of coding/scripting/Windows domain management) I have to agree with the author that often the Mac OS behavior is idiotic and NOT &#8220;more user friendly.&#8221;</p>
<p>To me, needing to issue a TERMINAL COMMAND is HELLISHLY more complex than it needs to be.  It is not &#8220;simple&#8221; by any stretch of the imagination.  You COULD use Powershell/CMD to do crap like this but the point is that in Windows basic stuff like this is EASY to do and follows LOGICAL, PREDICTABLE steps.</p>
<p>Obviously, as someone who has debugged hundreds of thousands of lines of assembly in IDA Pro, it&#8217;s not &#8220;hard&#8221; for me to use the terminal to show hidden files or create an archive, but I really don&#8217;t care about whether it&#8217;s &#8220;hard&#8221; for me.  The point is that it is outrageously harder IN COMPARISON to Windows to achieve the same thing (create a simple Zip file without added thumbnails/metadata).  Using a command line to accomplish things is virtually NEVER easier unless you (a) have a photographic memory (b) there is no other way.  Unix/Linux/Ubuntu did not become more popular/usable by ELIMINATING graphical options.</p>
<p>Saying &#8220;oh here&#8217;s the solution, just download a third party application to correct the problem&#8221; is basically agreeing that Mac has failed to do anything better than the competition, since that is basically how Windows/nix work.  The whole point of Mac is ALLEGEDLY that is does things better/more simply out of the box, but in fact it requires terminal commands to make basic changes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on easyJet blues by Letenky</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2009/10/25/easyjet-blues/#comment-240616</link>
		<dc:creator>Letenky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/?p=1153#comment-240616</guid>
		<description>Woah this blog is wonderful i really like reading your articles. Stay up the good work! You recognize, a lot of persons are hunting around for this information, you could help them greatly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah this blog is wonderful i really like reading your articles. Stay up the good work! You recognize, a lot of persons are hunting around for this information, you could help them greatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whats with __MACOSX in Zip files? by Dan Chokola</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2007/02/07/whats-with-__macosx-in-zip-files/#comment-238890</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Chokola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/blog/2007/02/07/793/#comment-238890</guid>
		<description>Disclaimer: I am not a Mac user and actually have a burning hatred for Macs and their fanbase. I came across this webpage trying to figure out just what is in those __MACOSX directories.

There are a couple solutions here. https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1640973?start=0&amp;tstart=0

IMHO, VII hit the nail on the head when he said that Mac is going mainstream. It invalidates the &quot;We are not stupid&quot; point as well. As Mac tries to sell itself to the average stupid user more and more, expect crap like this. Your best bet is to just use the command line, or roll your own script, which were made for the smart user.

The &quot;Redundant&quot; point is a memory/CPU time tradeoff. Rather than have a user recreate this metadata from files, which takes CPU time, it&#039;s stored in the zip file and available immediately to the user after it&#039;s unzipped. There is a legitimate reason for this, then. That said, I agree the metadata could probably be stuffed into the archive somehow that gets ignored by normal zip programs and picked up by the Mac zip program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disclaimer: I am not a Mac user and actually have a burning hatred for Macs and their fanbase. I came across this webpage trying to figure out just what is in those __MACOSX directories.</p>
<p>There are a couple solutions here. <a href="https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1640973?start=0&#038;tstart=0" rel="nofollow">https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1640973?start=0&#038;tstart=0</a></p>
<p>IMHO, VII hit the nail on the head when he said that Mac is going mainstream. It invalidates the &#8220;We are not stupid&#8221; point as well. As Mac tries to sell itself to the average stupid user more and more, expect crap like this. Your best bet is to just use the command line, or roll your own script, which were made for the smart user.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Redundant&#8221; point is a memory/CPU time tradeoff. Rather than have a user recreate this metadata from files, which takes CPU time, it&#8217;s stored in the zip file and available immediately to the user after it&#8217;s unzipped. There is a legitimate reason for this, then. That said, I agree the metadata could probably be stuffed into the archive somehow that gets ignored by normal zip programs and picked up by the Mac zip program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Angies List by Peter Jones</title>
		<link>http://floatingsun.net/2009/07/29/angies-list/#comment-233315</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floatingsun.net/?p=1129#comment-233315</guid>
		<description>Why on Earth would anyone join an online referral  club to find a contractor just 
amazes me. Its not rocket science to talk to friends, Co-Workers or Neighbours to find out the services they use. At the very least Google it, Yellow Pages , Yahoo Local or Craiglsist, you can always ask the Contractor for referrals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on Earth would anyone join an online referral  club to find a contractor just<br />
amazes me. Its not rocket science to talk to friends, Co-Workers or Neighbours to find out the services they use. At the very least Google it, Yellow Pages , Yahoo Local or Craiglsist, you can always ask the Contractor for referrals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.447 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-07 23:06:57 -->

